10 Must-Read Books On Economics
Here are 10 books I would recommend for anyone interested in learning free market economics. Some of them are challenging, but all of them are rewarding. I’ve tried to put them in rough order of difficulty, from easiest to most challenging. Aside from Hazlitt’s book, which is simply too important not to name, I didn’t include books that made my last reading list.
- Economics in One Lesson – Henry Hazlitt. Unsurpassed as an introduction to economics, this gold mine is one of those books you can keep coming back to again and again and learn something new each time. An example: I just flipped to a random page (146 in my version) on which Hazlitt addresses a question I hear all the time in one form or another: Is it possible for unions to increase employee pay at the expense of a company’s profits? For Hazlitt’s truly brilliant answer, you’ll have to check out the book.
- The Making of Modern Economics: The Lives and Ideas of the Great Thinkers – Mark Skousen. This is a good overview of the major thinkers in the history of economics, from Smith to Marx to Keynes to Hayek. The author is openly supportive of free markets, but his presentation of economists such as Veblen and Keynes is nonetheless fair (certainly more fair than the way free market thinkers have been treated in other similar works). There is a bit too much about the economists’ personal lives for my taste, but aside from that minor quibble, this is a great way to get acquainted with the history of economic thought.
- Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow – Ludwig von Mises. “And all the talk about the so-called unspeakable horror of early capitalism can be refuted by a single statistic: precisely in these years in which British capitalism developed. . .the population of England doubled, which means that hundreds or thousands of children—who would have died in preceding times—survived and grew to become men and women.” That’s just a sample of what you’ll find in this brief work, based on a series of extemporaneous lectures by the great economist. In Economic Policy, Mises sketches the essentials of his thought—from his economic defense of capitalism to his critiques of socialism and interventionism to the nature and cause of inflation.
- Prosperity Through Freedom – Lawrence Fertig. This volume, which unfortunately is out of print, was written by a friend of Mises. Indeed, I can’t do better than Mises’s own description of the book: “Step by step Mr. Fertig analyzes and invalidates all the dogmas of the Keynesian creed and all the slogans of the popular ‘statist’ prejudices. He demolishes the popular fable of the blissful effects of government interference in the market and of government spending. Prosperity Through Freedom is the most powerful plea for the value and ideals of Western Civilization. Every conscientious voter ought to read and reread this brilliant book and to remember its teachings on election day.”
- Selected Essays in Political Economy – Frédéric Bastiat. Bastiat was the Hazlitt of his generation (or, more accurately, Hazlitt was the Bastiat of his). Writing during the mid-19th century, Bastiat made the ideas of the classical economists accessible to everyone with his lively writing style, his vivid examples, and his telling analogies. This collection contains the brilliant “What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen,” on which Hazlitt would later base his “one lesson.”
- The Economic Way of Thinking – Paul Heyne (later editions feature additional authors). This textbook is a favorite of free market professors teaching introductory economics, and it’s no mystery why. The late Paul Heyne was masterful at explaining basic economic concepts with clarity and enthusiasm. The aim of the book is conveyed by the title: Heyne wanted students to grasp, not a jumble of conclusions, but how economists think about the world. He succeeds admirably.
- Economics for Real People – Gene Callahan. As you may have noticed, this list is heavily, heavily skewed toward the Austrian school of economics. This particular book is the best overview of the whole of Austrian economics I know of. Callahan is a good writer and does something that few economics writers do—gives plenty of clarifying (and original) examples. In particular, I want to draw your attention to chapter 13, which gives an outstanding account of the Austrian theory of the business cycle.
- Time and Money – Roger W. Garrison. This is an advanced, highly technical work, but for anyone who wants to reach a deep macro-level understanding of how an economy functions, Time and Money is unsurpassed. You can get a taste for Garrison’s thought in this video, “Hayek v. Keynes.”
- Capitalism – George Reisman. This is a veritable encyclopedia of free market economics, and I have learned more about capitalism from it than from any other single economics book. It is, however, very long and sometimes technical, so I recommend reading it selectively according to your interests. I also think Reisman’s approach is sometimes burdened by an over reliance on deduction—indeed, he claims, wrongly in my view, that economics is a deductive science. Nevertheless, this book is overflowing with economic insights. The best sections are chapter 3 (Natural Resources and the Environment), chapter 10 (Monopoly Versus Freedom of Competition), and chapter 13 (Productionism, Say’s Law, and Unemployment). You can download a PDF of the entire book for free here. (FYI, ARI ended its association with Reisman in 1994.)
- Human Action – Ludwig von Mises. This is Mises’s masterwork, and although it is pretty much the opposite of beach reading, if you put a lot into it, you’ll get a lot out of it—namely, a profound understanding of how markets function, and how government intervention distorts their functioning. One word of advice: you can profitably skip the first 90 pages, which consists of bad philosophy rather than good economics.
So what do you think? Are there any books you would add to the list? Any that you think I shouldn’t have included?
26 Comments to “10 Must-Read Books On Economics”
I am not an economist, but 40 years ago I did read some of the books you have listed. The only (and tentative) suggestion I can make is to perhaps replace _Human Action_ with von Mises’s _Socialism_ instead. The latter’s emphasis on pathology might be more helpful to non-economists. _Human Action_ is very difficult, even for someone trained to detect von Mises’s philosophical errors.
Thank you for writing the list. It is objective in its approach. You are looking for value, while recognizing pitfalls that accompany the values. You also recognize that some authors are mixed.
Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell is easily readable with tons of real world examples. Unfortunately his views on monopoly and antitrust are bad. However, I can forgive him since he used to be a Marxist.
Don,
Once again great work. I’ve thought for some time that bridging the information gap in economics is key to advancing the Objectivist philosophy. I have shared many of the “Front Page With Alan Barton” that you and Yaron appear on with my family, whom are not anywhere close to being economists; and they always comment on how “wow, those guys make economics make sense”. This is vastly different than when they watch the mainstream media and as soon as ‘experts’ start going into ‘M3 money supply’ and ‘possibilities for QE3’ issues, they just sort of glaze-over. This glazing over I think is when they end up just accepting whatever they are being told. Almost like an attitude of “well I don’t know what they are talking about, and they obviously do, so they must be right”. My hope is that this LF blog can start to bridge the gap and increase the knowledge level (of people like my family) to a point that they can comfortably see the erroneous claims made on economic topics. Again, thank you for all the work you and Yaron do, it’s greatly appreciated.
V/R
Danny
In economy, one perfect concept is to know that if something is not normal, is enought to prevent people of high risks.
These were good readings about fundamentals of economy, but it will be perfect to have also an ample view of how markets works with some readings about technical analisys, maybe John J. Murphy is the perfect author to start.
I don´t like extreme positions about who of them have the truth the most of the times they discuss, fundamentals or technicals, but is good to know why sometimes a market do some thing that fundamentals don´t know how to explain.
Thank you so much for these lists, I know I have a lot of reading to catch up on now. I was wondering if you had considered making a list of best books to understand the other side; similar to how Ayn Rand said it was a good idea to read people such as Kant for self defense.
Awesome idea, Jorge. I’ll put that together. Thanks.
Two books that helped me understand the left better: _The Vision of the Annointed_ by Thomas Sowell and _The Politics of Bad Faith_ by David Horowitz.
Thanks Kyle. I read Sowell’s book a long time ago and remember it begin very good. I haven’t read Horowtiz’s book, although it’s on my bookshelf. I’ll give it a look when I have a chance.
Have you ever tried to read Kant? I am trying to read “The Metaphysical Element” I am 20% through it and still don’t get it. But go ahead - it is available for a free download from Amazon. Here is one example that is at least understandable (most are not) “The less a man can be physically forced and the more he can be morally forced (by the mere idea of duty) so much the freer he is.”
So the Nazi guard that shot children was freer as he was doing his duty? He was freer as he was not forced physically? You can try to read this crap but it is a torture.
If Kant does not understand “freedom” how does that get us to understand the other side?
Radical Son by Horowitz — in which he writes about his life growing up under communist parents, his deep involvement with the radical left of the 1960s, and the reality of its evil that later slaps him in the face and causes his disillusionment — was an exceptional intellectual journey of a book.
Yes Joseph, what a profound book David Horowitz writes, Radical Son.
It’s very interesting to me, that his revelations, and his personal
epiphany of the great contradictions and blatant madness of the liberal
movement, are given scant comment or review by this countries great
commentators, pundints, and Academia. What gives? David is a smart guy,
he has been there, done that, and then writes as a true academic about
what he warns, is a evil, negative force. Yet, the crickets chirp, eh?
Don,
Love Human Action, just wish you told me to skip the first 90 pages before I read it! Almost killed it for me multiple starts.
If you are good at parsing out bad ideas from good, von Hayek’s Road to Serfdom and The Fatal Conceit are good
I think the one that I found most interesting was Carl Menger’s Principles of Economics, which proceeds from basic economic transactions up to more complex ones. He is very logical, I would say Aristotelian, in his arguments. Very good at defining his terms.
I suggest Capitalism 101 by Leon Weinstein. It a basic explanation of the ethics of Capitalism on a personal level with engaging questions. It is easy to read and I think good for teaching children as well as mis-educated adults. Note: the author is not a native English speaker so there are some misplaced words. . . some likely due to the editing software, but easily figured out. At Amazon & Barnes & Noble 99cents for the eBook, and $14.95 for the hardcover.
I’m currently helping my high school son work his way through “Lessons for the Young Economist,” by Robert P. Murphy of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. It was the only true introductory textbook I could find that wasn’t written from a Keynesian perspective. I am not familiar with either the Heyne or Callahan books (but will investigate).
Mark, you know that a .pdf of the teacher’s manual for that book has been put on mises.org for free too. I think they did this recently.
Murray Rothbard’s ‘What has government done with our money’ is a short and fantastic read about how money arises in an economy and how the government has hijacking the monetary system. [Despite of all of Rothbard’s shortcomings, none of them show up in this short and wonderful work] It is available for free here: http://www.mises.org/document/617/What-Has-Government-Done-to-Our-Money .
Don, thank you for this list and the others. I find them very useful. However, in regard to your comment on Reisman’s Capitalism, he considers economics to be essentially a deductive science, not purely a deductive science as your comment may be construed to imply. I don’t know enough about economics to say whether he is correct or not, but I just wanted to clarify his actual position.
Economics is essentially a deductive science - that is the position espoused by the Austrian school. There’s no way to come up with an economic theory based purely on induction, or observation of raw data, and no way to falsify an economic proposition by conducting an experiment - because in social sciences, experiments are impossible as in natural sciences. I don’t know how exactly Ayn Rand approached this, as I haven’t read her remarks on margins of Human Action, but there is no other way to conduct sound economic theorizing. That’s why Austrian school of economics is superior to mathematicized, positivist mainstream economics engaged mostly with abstract modelling, not real economic reasoning.
I’ve been reading Sowell and Hayek. From Sowell. . .Knowledge and Decisions, Basic Economics, and Applied Economics are particularly good. And I’m currently reading Hayek’s The Fatal Conceit.
I have not read any of the books in this list. I’ll have to pick only one or two of them because my reading list is already becoming unmanageable. Excellent topic. Thanks!
Heh. . . my reading list has been unmanageable for months, if not years. Don’s recommended reading lists are not helping with this. . .
I would love to see Juggernaut on a list like this—comprehensive and superbly written. http://www.juggernautcometh.com/blog/
Nothing by Milton Friedman? “Free to Choose” was one of the first books I read by an economist that opened my eyes to a way of looking at the world radically different from what I learned in my very left wing political science university classes.
Great books - if one wants to understand the “other side” then read Russell Kirk.
I believe the two greatest books in the 20th Century were Wealth and Poverty by Gilder and The Constitution of Liberty by Heyek. Also, any book by Sowell or Drucker’s later books are all worthwhile.
Thank you Don for the list. I see that F.A. Hayek is missing from the list completely. His Road to Serfdom really impressed me when I was very young. I must admit though that I read the book a good 25 years ago and am not sure I would include it as a more mature thinker now. But it’s a suggestion now.